Jump to content

Talk:01 Software Development Lifecycle

Add topic
From HEIN+FRICKE

1. Introduction[edit | edit source]

This document defines the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) followed at Hein Fricke. It provides standardized guidelines for managing software development projects, ensuring clarity, accountability, and consistency across teams.

2. Purpose & Scope[edit | edit source]

The purpose of this document is to define and standardize the software development lifecycle process to ensure efficient, high-quality, secure, and audit-compliant project delivery.

This SDLC applies to all software development projects undertaken by Hein Fricke, including internal tools, client-facing applications, automation systems, and embedded software solutions.

3. Project Management Guidelines[edit | edit source]

  • All development activities are structured around agile principles with sprint-based planning.
  • Each developer must take complete ownership of their assigned feature or task — including delivery, quality, and communication.
  • Task understanding, requirement clarification, and impact analysis are prerequisites to any design or implementation work.

4. Requirement Analysis & Task Ownership[edit | edit source]

  • Understand and document the user needs using documents like Business Requirement Document (BRD) or Functional Requirements Specification (FRS).
  • Understand the assigned task/feature along with its expected outcome.
  • Discuss with stakeholders and peers to clarify requirements, assumptions, and dependencies.
  • Perform code impact analysis — identify affected components and modules.
  • Document expected code changes clearly in the associated task/story.

5. Planning & Estimations[edit | edit source]

  • Define the project scope, timeline, and resources.
  • Provide realistic estimates covering:
    • Development
    • Unit testing
    • Functional testing
    • Regression testing
  • Avoid both over- and under-estimation; validate estimates with your lead.
  • Update estimates as the understanding of the feature evolves.

6. Task Management in ODOO[edit | edit source]

  • Create a new story with proper ID and a clear, self-explanatory description.
  • Break the story into sub-tasks, each representing a functional block or logical unit.
  • Follow task progression: Todo → In Progress → Complete.
  • Ensure not too many tasks remain under In Progress; this should reflect actual work in progress.
  • Reassign completed tasks to testers only after meeting all acceptance criteria.

7. Time Booking & Dashboards[edit | edit source]

  • Book time daily with descriptive, meaningful comments.
  • Complete time logs before logging off every day.
  • Update the client dashboard (e.g., JIRA) regularly to reflect weekly progress.
  • If access is restricted, coordinate with a peer to ensure updates are made.

8. Design & Implementation Best Practices[edit | edit source]

  • Code the application based on design documents.
  • Do not start coding immediately - begin with:
    • Data model design
    • Algorithm planning
    • Peer discussion for design validation
  • Document assumptions and Q&A threads in the ODOO story for transparency.
  • Prioritize root cause analysis via data inspection before code review for bugs.

9. Source Code Management[edit | edit source]

  • Create a feature branch from the latest develop branch.
  • Commit changes daily with messages starting with the ODOO Story ID.
  • Push changes once tested and stable.
  • Follow Java and organizational coding standards.
  • Perform thorough unit testing before marking the task as complete.

10. Testing & Quality Assurance[edit | edit source]

  • Verify the software functions as expected and meets requirements.
  • Test both best-case and worst-case scenarios.
  • Keep unit test cases updated and ensure they cover all core logic.
  • Get your code peer-reviewed — it is the developer’s responsibility to initiate and complete this early, especially for large features.
  • After review and testing, merge the feature branch into staging for final testing.
  • Ensure minimum rework — this reflects strong initial analysis and testing quality.

11. Finalization & Release[edit | edit source]

  • Fix identified bugs and get confirmation they don’t introduce regressions.
  • Limit rework by validating changes during the SDLC, not post-QA.
  • Once ready for release, merge changes into the develop branch in time for the next delivery cycle.

12. Communication & Team Collaboration[edit | edit source]

  • Attend daily standups/scrum calls and clearly communicate:
    • What you did
    • What you're doing
    • Any blockers
  • Use Microsoft Teams and Outlook for team communication.
  • Respond to messages at the earliest, especially when tagged or mentioned.
  • Ask for help if stuck — don’t spend excessive time unproductively.

13. Leave & Emergency Protocol[edit | edit source]

  • Inform the team in advance about planned leaves.
  • In case of emergencies, notify peers as early as possible.

14. Responsibilities of Team Leads[edit | edit source]

  • Plan sprints in advance and ensure:
    • Task breakdown
    • Developer clarity on requirements
    • Balanced workload
  • Help developers validate estimates and monitor timeline adherence.
  • Step in to unblock stuck teammates and provide direction.
  • Collect regular feedback and arrange whiteboard sessions to explain concepts, resolve blockers, and enhance peer learning.

15. Summary[edit | edit source]

This SDLC ensures disciplined software delivery with predictable outcomes. By enforcing early analysis, proactive communication, robust testing, and peer collaboration, Hein Fricke builds a high-quality codebase while maintaining audit-readiness. All team members are expected to adhere to these practices and continuously improve execution discipline.