Talk:02 Code Review and Approval Procedure: Difference between revisions
Appearance
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== 1. Introduction == | == 1. Introduction == | ||
=== | === 1.1 Purpose: === | ||
* Establish a standardized process for reviewing and approving code changes to maintain quality, catch issues early, and ensure audit traceability using tools like Git. | * Establish a standardized process for reviewing and approving code changes to maintain quality, catch issues early, and ensure audit traceability using tools like Git. | ||
=== | === 1.2 Scope: === | ||
* Covers all code changes in software projects across development teams, focusing on Git-based repositories. | * Covers all code changes in software projects across development teams, focusing on Git-based repositories. | ||
=== | === 1.3 Objectives: === | ||
* Enforce coding standards, reduce bugs, promote collaboration, and keep detailed records for internal audits. | * Enforce coding standards, reduce bugs, promote collaboration, and keep detailed records for internal audits. | ||
=== | === 1.4 Key Terms: === | ||
* Git: Version control system for tracking code changes. | * Git: Version control system for tracking code changes. | ||
* Branching: Creating separate code lines (e.g., feature branches) in Git. | * Branching: Creating separate code lines (e.g., feature branches) in Git. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Reviewer: Assigned team member who evaluates the PR. | * Reviewer: Assigned team member who evaluates the PR. | ||
=== | === 1.5 Standards: === | ||
* Align with company coding guidelines and audit requirements for traceability. | * Align with company coding guidelines and audit requirements for traceability. | ||
=== | === 1.6 Audience: === | ||
* Developers, reviewers, team leads, and auditors. | * Developers, reviewers, team leads, and auditors. | ||
=== | === 1.7 How to Use: === | ||
* Follow this for all code changes; store in Confluence for access. | * Follow this for all code changes; store in Confluence for access. | ||
== | == 2. Roles and Responsibilities == | ||
=== | === 2.1 Key Roles: === | ||
* Developer: Makes code changes, runs tests, creates PRs. | * Developer: Makes code changes, runs tests, creates PRs. | ||
* Reviewer: Reviews PRs, adds comments, approves or requests changes. | * Reviewer: Reviews PRs, adds comments, approves or requests changes. | ||
* Team Lead: Assigns reviewers, resolves issues, ensures process adherence. | * Team Lead: Assigns reviewers, resolves issues, ensures process adherence. | ||
=== | === 2.2 Developer Tasks: === | ||
* Use Git for branching and code changes. | * Use Git for branching and code changes. | ||
* Run test cases before creating PRs. | * Run test cases before creating PRs. | ||
* Act on reviewer comments and update PRs. | * Act on reviewer comments and update PRs. | ||
=== | === 2.3 Reviewer Tasks: === | ||
* Review code, add comments on issues. | * Review code, add comments on issues. | ||
* Re-review updates until PR is approved. | * Re-review updates until PR is approved. | ||
=== | === 2.4 Team Collaboration: === | ||
* Use Slack #code-reviews for notifications. | * Use Slack #code-reviews for notifications. | ||
* Link PRs to Jira tickets for tracking. | * Link PRs to Jira tickets for tracking. | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== 3. Code Review and Approval Process Overview == | == 3. Code Review and Approval Process Overview == | ||
=== | === Goal: === | ||
* Ensure code changes are reviewed thoroughly via Git, with tests run and comments addressed before approval. | * Ensure code changes are reviewed thoroughly via Git, with tests run and comments addressed before approval. | ||
=== | === Core Steps: === | ||
* Use Git for all version control. | * Use Git for all version control. | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
* Merge approved PR. | * Merge approved PR. | ||
=== | === SDLC Fit: === | ||
* Integrate with Agile sprints (review PRs daily) or Waterfall phases; track in Jira. | * Integrate with Agile sprints (review PRs daily) or Waterfall phases; track in Jira. | ||
=== | === Change Tracking: === | ||
* Use Git commits linked to Jira (e.g., “Fix JIRA-123”). | * Use Git commits linked to Jira (e.g., “Fix JIRA-123”). | ||
=== | === Process Flow: === | ||
* Step 1: Developer branches in Git and makes changes. | * Step 1: Developer branches in Git and makes changes. | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
* Step 5: Repeat reviews until approval; merge PR. | * Step 5: Repeat reviews until approval; merge PR. | ||
=== | === Exceptions: === | ||
* Emergency changes allow quick approval with Team Lead sign-off; log in Jira. | * Emergency changes allow quick approval with Team Lead sign-off; log in Jira. | ||
=== | === Version Control: === | ||
* Require Git branches like feature/JIRA-123; protect main. | * Require Git branches like feature/JIRA-123; protect main. | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
* '''Automation''': Use GitHub Actions for auto-tests on PR creation. | * '''Automation''': Use GitHub Actions for auto-tests on PR creation. | ||
== | == 4. Code Review Planning == | ||
=== | === Review Types: === | ||
* Feature: For new code changes (e.g., new API). | * Feature: For new code changes (e.g., new API). | ||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
* Emergency: For urgent fixes. | * Emergency: For urgent fixes. | ||
=== | === Scheduling: === | ||
* Plan reviews in daily standups; set 24-hour turnaround. | * Plan reviews in daily standups; set 24-hour turnaround. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
* Notify via Teams when PR is ready. | * Notify via Teams when PR is ready. | ||
=== | === Review Criteria: === | ||
* Code changes follow style guides. | * Code changes follow style guides. | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
* No security issues. | * No security issues. | ||
=== | === Risk Checks: === | ||
* Verify code changes don't break existing features. | * Verify code changes don't break existing features. | ||
* Ensure test cases cover edge cases. | * Ensure test cases cover edge cases. | ||
=== | === Mitigation Plans: === | ||
* Run automated tests before PR. | * Run automated tests before PR. | ||
* Use Git rebase for clean history. | * Use Git rebase for clean history. | ||
=== | === Approvals: === | ||
* At least 1 reviewer; 2 for critical changes. | * At least 1 reviewer; 2 for critical changes. | ||
* Log in Git PR. | * Log in Git PR. | ||
=== | === Communication: === | ||
* Share PR links in Teams. | * Share PR links in Teams. | ||
* Update Jira with status. | * Update Jira with status. | ||
=== | === PR Description: === | ||
* Include Jira ID, code changes summary, test results. | * Include Jira ID, code changes summary, test results. | ||
=== | === Dependencies: === | ||
* Check library versions in Git commits. | * Check library versions in Git commits. | ||
== | == 5. Code Review and Approval Execution == | ||
=== | === Pre-Review Activities: === | ||
* '''Git and Branching''': Use Git; create branches (e.g., git checkout -b feature/JIRA-123). | * '''Git and Branching''': Use Git; create branches (e.g., git checkout -b feature/JIRA-123). | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
* '''Checklist''': Confirm tests pass, link Jira, notify on Teams. | * '''Checklist''': Confirm tests pass, link Jira, notify on Teams. | ||
=== | === Review Execution: === | ||
* '''Assign Reviewer''': Team Lead confirms assignment. | * '''Assign Reviewer''': Team Lead confirms assignment. | ||
| Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
* '''Logging''': Record comments/approvals in Git. | * '''Logging''': Record comments/approvals in Git. | ||
=== | === Post-Review Activities: === | ||
* '''Approval''': Reviewer approves; merge PR (e.g., squash merge). | * '''Approval''': Reviewer approves; merge PR (e.g., squash merge). | ||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
* '''Documentation''': Update Confluence if needed. | * '''Documentation''': Update Confluence if needed. | ||
== | == 6. Document Control and Versioning == | ||
* '''Owner''': Team Lead; backup Senior Developer. | * '''Owner''': Team Lead; backup Senior Developer. | ||
| Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
* '''Updates''': Approve via Team Lead/CTO. | * '''Updates''': Approve via Team Lead/CTO. | ||
== | == 7. Appendices == | ||
* '''Templates''': PR template, review checklist. | * '''Templates''': PR template, review checklist. | ||
Revision as of 10:43, 22 December 2025
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose:
- Establish a standardized process for reviewing and approving code changes to maintain quality, catch issues early, and ensure audit traceability using tools like Git.
1.2 Scope:
- Covers all code changes in software projects across development teams, focusing on Git-based repositories.
1.3 Objectives:
- Enforce coding standards, reduce bugs, promote collaboration, and keep detailed records for internal audits.
1.4 Key Terms:
- Git: Version control system for tracking code changes.
- Branching: Creating separate code lines (e.g., feature branches) in Git.
- Pull Request (PR): Git mechanism for proposing and reviewing code changes.
- Reviewer: Assigned team member who evaluates the PR.
1.5 Standards:
- Align with company coding guidelines and audit requirements for traceability.
1.6 Audience:
- Developers, reviewers, team leads, and auditors.
1.7 How to Use:
- Follow this for all code changes; store in Confluence for access.
2. Roles and Responsibilities
2.1 Key Roles:
- Developer: Makes code changes, runs tests, creates PRs.
- Reviewer: Reviews PRs, adds comments, approves or requests changes.
- Team Lead: Assigns reviewers, resolves issues, ensures process adherence.
2.2 Developer Tasks:
- Use Git for branching and code changes.
- Run test cases before creating PRs.
- Act on reviewer comments and update PRs.
2.3 Reviewer Tasks:
- Review code, add comments on issues.
- Re-review updates until PR is approved.
2.4 Team Collaboration:
- Use Slack #code-reviews for notifications.
- Link PRs to Jira tickets for tracking.
3. Code Review and Approval Process Overview
Goal:
- Ensure code changes are reviewed thoroughly via Git, with tests run and comments addressed before approval.
Core Steps:
- Use Git for all version control.
- Apply branching strategy for code changes.
- Make code changes and run test cases.
- Create Pull Request in Git.
- Assign reviewer(s).
- Reviewer reviews and add comments.
- Comments are acted upon by the developer.
- Review and repeat until PR approval.
- Merge approved PR.
SDLC Fit:
- Integrate with Agile sprints (review PRs daily) or Waterfall phases; track in Jira.
Change Tracking:
- Use Git commits linked to Jira (e.g., “Fix JIRA-123”).
Process Flow:
- Step 1: Developer branches in Git and makes changes.
- Step 2: Run tests locally or in CI.
- Step 3: Create PR, assign reviewer.
- Step 4: Reviewer adds comments; developer acts on them.
- Step 5: Repeat reviews until approval; merge PR.
Exceptions:
- Emergency changes allow quick approval with Team Lead sign-off; log in Jira.
Version Control:
- Require Git branches like feature/JIRA-123; protect main.
- Automation: Use GitHub Actions for auto-tests on PR creation.
4. Code Review Planning
Review Types:
- Feature: For new code changes (e.g., new API).
- Bugfix: For minor updates.
- Emergency: For urgent fixes.
Scheduling:
- Plan reviews in daily standups; set 24-hour turnaround.
- Use Git branching to isolate changes.
- Notify via Teams when PR is ready.
Review Criteria:
- Code changes follow style guides.
- Test cases run and pass (e.g., >90% coverage).
- No security issues.
Risk Checks:
- Verify code changes don't break existing features.
- Ensure test cases cover edge cases.
Mitigation Plans:
- Run automated tests before PR.
- Use Git rebase for clean history.
Approvals:
- At least 1 reviewer; 2 for critical changes.
- Log in Git PR.
Communication:
- Share PR links in Teams.
- Update Jira with status.
PR Description:
- Include Jira ID, code changes summary, test results.
Dependencies:
- Check library versions in Git commits.
5. Code Review and Approval Execution
Pre-Review Activities:
- Git and Branching: Use Git; create branches (e.g., git checkout -b feature/JIRA-123).
- Code Changes: Do code changes
- Run Test Case: Execute unit/integration tests local
- Commit Changes: Commit changes (e.g., git commit -m "JIRA-123: Add login")
- Create Pull Request: Push branch, create PR in GitHub/Bitbucket with description.
- Assign Reviewer: Select reviewer(s) in PR tool or Jira.
- Checklist: Confirm tests pass, link Jira, notify on Teams.
Review Execution:
- Assign Reviewer: Team Lead confirms assignment.
- Reviewer Reviews and Adds Comments: Evaluate code, add feedback on standards, tests, and issues.
- Comments Are Acted Upon: Developer updates code, commits, and notifies reviewer.
- Review and Repeat: Re-review updates until all issues resolved and PR approved.
- Tools: GitHub/Bitbucket for reviews; SonarQube for quality.
- Checklist: Verify functionality, style, tests.
- Feedback: Use “Request Changes” or “Approve” in Git tool.
- Logging: Record comments/approvals in Git.
Post-Review Activities:
- Approval: Reviewer approves; merge PR (e.g., squash merge).
- Verification: Run CI tests post-merge.
- Notifications: Post merge in Teams; update Jira.
- Documentation: Update Confluence if needed.
6. Document Control and Versioning
- Owner: Team Lead; backup Senior Developer.
- Changelog: v1.0 (2025-09-22): Initial based on user points.
- Review: Every 6 months.
- Retention: 3 years in Confluence/AWS S3.
- Access: Team leads edit; auditors view.
- Updates: Approve via Team Lead/CTO.
7. Appendices
- Templates: PR template, review checklist.
- Glossary: Git, PR, Branching.
- References: Coding standards policy.
- Contacts: Team Lead: [Name], [Email], Slack @[handle].
- Sample Logs: PR approval: “Approved by [Reviewer] at [Date].”
- Checklists: Pre-review table (Git, tests, PR).