Jump to content

Talk:02 Code Review and Approval Procedure: Difference between revisions

From HEIN+FRICKE
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== 1. Introduction ==
== 1. Introduction ==


* '''Purpose''': Establish a standardized process for reviewing and approving code changes to maintain quality, catch issues early, and ensure audit traceability using tools like Git.  
=== '''Purpose''': ===
* Establish a standardized process for reviewing and approving code changes to maintain quality, catch issues early, and ensure audit traceability using tools like Git.


* '''Scope''': Covers all code changes in software projects across development teams, focusing on Git-based repositories.  
=== '''Scope''': ===
* Covers all code changes in software projects across development teams, focusing on Git-based repositories.


* '''Objectives''': Enforce coding standards, reduce bugs, promote collaboration, and keep detailed records for internal audits.  
=== '''Objectives''': ===
* Enforce coding standards, reduce bugs, promote collaboration, and keep detailed records for internal audits.


* '''Key Terms''':  
=== '''Key Terms''': ===
** Git: Version control system for tracking code changes.  
* Git: Version control system for tracking code changes.
** Branching: Creating separate code lines (e.g., feature branches) in Git.  
* Branching: Creating separate code lines (e.g., feature branches) in Git.
** Pull Request (PR): Git mechanism for proposing and reviewing code changes.  
* Pull Request (PR): Git mechanism for proposing and reviewing code changes.
** Reviewer: Assigned team member who evaluates the PR.  
* Reviewer: Assigned team member who evaluates the PR.


* '''Standards''': Align with company coding guidelines and audit requirements for traceability.  
=== '''Standards''': ===
* Align with company coding guidelines and audit requirements for traceability.


* '''Audience''': Developers, reviewers, team leads, and auditors.  
=== '''Audience''': ===
* Developers, reviewers, team leads, and auditors.


* '''How to Use''': Follow this for all code changes; store in Confluence for access.  
=== '''How to Use''': ===
* Follow this for all code changes; store in Confluence for access.


== '''2. Roles and Responsibilities''' ==
== '''2. Roles and Responsibilities''' ==

Revision as of 07:06, 22 December 2025

1. Introduction

Purpose:

  • Establish a standardized process for reviewing and approving code changes to maintain quality, catch issues early, and ensure audit traceability using tools like Git.

Scope:

  • Covers all code changes in software projects across development teams, focusing on Git-based repositories.

Objectives:

  • Enforce coding standards, reduce bugs, promote collaboration, and keep detailed records for internal audits.

Key Terms:

  • Git: Version control system for tracking code changes.
  • Branching: Creating separate code lines (e.g., feature branches) in Git.
  • Pull Request (PR): Git mechanism for proposing and reviewing code changes.
  • Reviewer: Assigned team member who evaluates the PR.

Standards:

  • Align with company coding guidelines and audit requirements for traceability.

Audience:

  • Developers, reviewers, team leads, and auditors.

How to Use:

  • Follow this for all code changes; store in Confluence for access.

2. Roles and Responsibilities

Key Roles:

  • Developer: Makes code changes, runs tests, creates PRs.
  • Reviewer: Reviews PRs, adds comments, approves or requests changes.
  • Team Lead: Assigns reviewers, resolves issues, ensures process adherence.

Developer Tasks:

  • Use Git for branching and code changes.
  • Run test cases before creating PRs.
  • Act on reviewer comments and update PRs.

Reviewer Tasks:

  • Review code, add comments on issues.
  • Re-review updates until PR is approved.

Team Collaboration:

  • Use Slack #code-reviews for notifications.
  • Link PRs to Jira tickets for tracking.

3. Code Review and Approval Process Overview

Goal:

  • Ensure code changes are reviewed thoroughly via Git, with tests run and comments addressed before approval.

Core Steps:

  • Use Git for all version control.
  • Apply branching strategy for code changes.
  • Make code changes and run test cases.
  • Create Pull Request in Git.
  • Assign reviewer(s).
  • Reviewer reviews and add comments.
  • Comments are acted upon by the developer.
  • Review and repeat until PR approval.
  • Merge approved PR.

SDLC Fit:

  • Integrate with Agile sprints (review PRs daily) or Waterfall phases; track in Jira.

Change Tracking:

  • Use Git commits linked to Jira (e.g., “Fix JIRA-123”).

Process Flow:

  • Step 1: Developer branches in Git and makes changes.
  • Step 2: Run tests locally or in CI.
  • Step 3: Create PR, assign reviewer.
  • Step 4: Reviewer adds comments; developer acts on them.
  • Step 5: Repeat reviews until approval; merge PR.

Exceptions:

  • Emergency changes allow quick approval with Team Lead sign-off; log in Jira.

Version Control:

  • Require Git branches like feature/JIRA-123; protect main.
  • Automation: Use GitHub Actions for auto-tests on PR creation.

4. Code Review Planning

Review Types:

  • Feature: For new code changes (e.g., new API).
  • Bugfix: For minor updates.
  • Emergency: For urgent fixes.

Scheduling:

  • Plan reviews in daily standups; set 24-hour turnaround.
  • Use Git branching to isolate changes.
  • Notify via Teams when PR is ready.

Review Criteria:

  • Code changes follow style guides.
  • Test cases run and pass (e.g., >90% coverage).
  • No security issues.

Risk Checks:

  • Verify code changes don't break existing features.
  • Ensure test cases cover edge cases.

Mitigation Plans:

  • Run automated tests before PR.
  • Use Git rebase for clean history.

Approvals:

  • At least 1 reviewer; 2 for critical changes.
  • Log in Git PR.

Communication:

  • Share PR links in Teams.
  • Update Jira with status.

PR Description:

  • Include Jira ID, code changes summary, test results.

Dependencies:

  • Check library versions in Git commits.

5. Code Review and Approval Execution

Pre-Review Activities:

  • Git and Branching: Use Git; create branches (e.g., git checkout -b feature/JIRA-123).
  • Code Changes: Do code changes
  • Run Test Case: Execute unit/integration tests local
  • Commit Changes: Commit changes (e.g., git commit -m "JIRA-123: Add login")
  • Create Pull Request: Push branch, create PR in GitHub/Bitbucket with description.
  • Assign Reviewer: Select reviewer(s) in PR tool or Jira.
  • Checklist: Confirm tests pass, link Jira, notify on Teams.

Review Execution:

  • Assign Reviewer: Team Lead confirms assignment.
  • Reviewer Reviews and Adds Comments: Evaluate code, add feedback on standards, tests, and issues.
  • Comments Are Acted Upon: Developer updates code, commits, and notifies reviewer.
  • Review and Repeat: Re-review updates until all issues resolved and PR approved.
  • Tools: GitHub/Bitbucket for reviews; SonarQube for quality.
  • Checklist: Verify functionality, style, tests.
  • Feedback: Use “Request Changes” or “Approve” in Git tool.
  • Logging: Record comments/approvals in Git.

Post-Review Activities:

  • Approval: Reviewer approves; merge PR (e.g., squash merge).
  • Verification: Run CI tests post-merge.
  • Notifications: Post merge in Teams; update Jira.
  • Documentation: Update Confluence if needed.

6. Document Control and Versioning

  • Owner: Team Lead; backup Senior Developer.
  • Changelog: v1.0 (2025-09-22): Initial based on user points.
  • Review: Every 6 months.
  • Retention: 3 years in Confluence/AWS S3.
  • Access: Team leads edit; auditors view.
  • Updates: Approve via Team Lead/CTO.

7. Appendices

  • Templates: PR template, review checklist.
  • Glossary: Git, PR, Branching.
  • References: Coding standards policy.
  • Contacts: Team Lead: [Name], [Email], Slack @[handle].
  • Sample Logs: PR approval: “Approved by [Reviewer] at [Date].”
  • Checklists: Pre-review table (Git, tests, PR).