Talk:Software Development Lifecycle: Difference between revisions
Add topic Created blank page |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Introduction == | |||
This document defines the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) followed at Hein Fricke. It provides standardized guidelines for managing software development projects, ensuring clarity, accountability, and consistency across teams. | |||
== Purpose & Scope == | |||
The purpose of this document is to define and standardize the software development lifecycle process to ensure efficient, high-quality, secure, and audit-compliant project delivery. | |||
This SDLC applies to all software development projects undertaken by Hein Fricke, including internal tools, client-facing applications, automation systems, and embedded software solutions. | |||
== Project Management Guidelines == | |||
* All development activities are structured around agile principles with sprint-based planning. | |||
* Each developer must take '''complete ownership''' of their assigned feature or task — including delivery, quality, and communication. | |||
* Task understanding, requirement clarification, and impact analysis are prerequisites to any design or implementation work. | |||
== Requirement Analysis & Task Ownership == | |||
* Understand and '''document the user needs''' using documents like Business Requirement Document (BRD) or Functional Requirements Specification (FRS) | |||
* Understand the '''assigned task/feature''' along with its expected outcome. | |||
* Discuss with stakeholders and peers to clarify '''requirements, assumptions, and dependencies'''. | |||
* Perform '''code impact analysis''' — identify affected components and modules. | |||
* Document expected code changes clearly in the associated task/story. | |||
== Planning & Estimations == | |||
* Define the project scope, timeline, and resources | |||
* Provide '''realistic estimates''' covering: | |||
** Development | |||
** Unit testing | |||
** Functional testing | |||
** Regression testing | |||
* Avoid both over- and under-estimation; validate estimates with your lead. | |||
* Update estimates as the understanding of the feature evolves. | |||
== Task Management in Odoo == | |||
* Create a new '''story''' with proper ID and a clear, self-explanatory description. | |||
* Break the story into '''sub-tasks''', each representing a functional block or logical unit. | |||
* Follow task progression: '''Todo → In Progress → Complete'''. | |||
* Ensure not too many tasks remain under ''In Progress''; this should reflect actual work in progress. | |||
* Reassign completed tasks to testers only after meeting all acceptance criteria. | |||
== Time Bookings & Dashboard == | |||
* Book time '''daily''' with descriptive, meaningful comments. | |||
* Complete time logs '''before logging off''' every day. | |||
* Update the '''client dashboard''' (e.g., JIRA) regularly to reflect weekly progress. | |||
* If access is restricted, coordinate with a peer to ensure updates are made. | |||
== Design & Implementation Best Practices == | |||
* Code the application based on design documents. | |||
* Do not start coding immediately — begin with: | |||
** Data model design | |||
** Algorithm planning | |||
** Peer discussion for design validation | |||
* Document assumptions and Q&A threads in the '''ODOO story''' for transparency. | |||
* Prioritize '''root cause analysis via data inspection''' before code review for bugs. | |||
== Source Code Management == | |||
* Create a '''feature branch''' from the latest develop branch. | |||
* Commit changes '''daily''' with messages starting with the ODOO Story ID. | |||
* Push changes once tested and stable. | |||
* Follow Java and organizational coding standards. | |||
* Perform thorough unit testing before marking the task as complete. | |||
== Testing & Quality Assurance == | |||
* Verify the software functions as expected and meets requirements. | |||
* Test '''both best-case and worst-case''' scenarios. | |||
* Keep '''unit test cases updated''' and ensure they cover all core logic. | |||
* Get your '''code peer-reviewed''' — it is the developer’s responsibility to initiate and complete this early, especially for large features. | |||
* After review and testing, merge the feature branch into '''staging''' for final testing. | |||
* Ensure '''minimum rework''' — this reflects strong initial analysis and testing quality. | |||
== Finalization & Release == | |||
* Fix identified bugs and get confirmation they don’t introduce regressions. | |||
* Limit rework by validating changes during the SDLC, not post-QA. | |||
* Once ready for release, merge changes into the '''develop''' branch in time for the next delivery cycle. | |||
== Communication & Team Collaboration == | |||
* Attend '''daily standups/scrum calls''' and clearly communicate: | |||
* What you did | |||
* What you're doing | |||
* Any blockers | |||
* Use '''Microsoft Teams and Outlook''' for team communication. | |||
* Respond to messages at the earliest, especially when tagged or mentioned. | |||
* Ask for help if stuck — don’t spend excessive time unproductively. | |||
== Leave & Emergency Protocol == | |||
* Inform the team in advance about planned leaves. | |||
* In case of emergencies, notify peers as early as possible. | |||
== Responsibilities of Team Lead == | |||
* Plan sprints in advance and ensure: | |||
** Task breakdown | |||
** Developer clarity on requirements | |||
** Balanced workload | |||
* Help developers validate estimates and monitor timeline adherence. | |||
* Step in to '''unblock stuck teammates''' and provide direction. | |||
* Collect regular feedback and arrange '''whiteboard sessions''' to explain concepts, resolve blockers, and enhance peer learning. | |||
== Summary == | |||
This SDLC ensures disciplined software delivery with predictable outcomes. By enforcing early analysis, proactive communication, robust testing, and peer collaboration, Hein Fricke builds a high-quality codebase while maintaining audit-readiness. All team members are expected to adhere to these practices and continuously improve execution discipline. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:25, 10 December 2025
Introduction[edit | edit source]
This document defines the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) followed at Hein Fricke. It provides standardized guidelines for managing software development projects, ensuring clarity, accountability, and consistency across teams.
Purpose & Scope[edit | edit source]
The purpose of this document is to define and standardize the software development lifecycle process to ensure efficient, high-quality, secure, and audit-compliant project delivery.
This SDLC applies to all software development projects undertaken by Hein Fricke, including internal tools, client-facing applications, automation systems, and embedded software solutions.
Project Management Guidelines[edit | edit source]
- All development activities are structured around agile principles with sprint-based planning.
- Each developer must take complete ownership of their assigned feature or task — including delivery, quality, and communication.
- Task understanding, requirement clarification, and impact analysis are prerequisites to any design or implementation work.
Requirement Analysis & Task Ownership[edit | edit source]
- Understand and document the user needs using documents like Business Requirement Document (BRD) or Functional Requirements Specification (FRS)
- Understand the assigned task/feature along with its expected outcome.
- Discuss with stakeholders and peers to clarify requirements, assumptions, and dependencies.
- Perform code impact analysis — identify affected components and modules.
- Document expected code changes clearly in the associated task/story.
Planning & Estimations[edit | edit source]
- Define the project scope, timeline, and resources
- Provide realistic estimates covering:
- Development
- Unit testing
- Functional testing
- Regression testing
- Avoid both over- and under-estimation; validate estimates with your lead.
- Update estimates as the understanding of the feature evolves.
Task Management in Odoo[edit | edit source]
- Create a new story with proper ID and a clear, self-explanatory description.
- Break the story into sub-tasks, each representing a functional block or logical unit.
- Follow task progression: Todo → In Progress → Complete.
- Ensure not too many tasks remain under In Progress; this should reflect actual work in progress.
- Reassign completed tasks to testers only after meeting all acceptance criteria.
Time Bookings & Dashboard[edit | edit source]
- Book time daily with descriptive, meaningful comments.
- Complete time logs before logging off every day.
- Update the client dashboard (e.g., JIRA) regularly to reflect weekly progress.
- If access is restricted, coordinate with a peer to ensure updates are made.
Design & Implementation Best Practices[edit | edit source]
- Code the application based on design documents.
- Do not start coding immediately — begin with:
- Data model design
- Algorithm planning
- Peer discussion for design validation
- Document assumptions and Q&A threads in the ODOO story for transparency.
- Prioritize root cause analysis via data inspection before code review for bugs.
Source Code Management[edit | edit source]
- Create a feature branch from the latest develop branch.
- Commit changes daily with messages starting with the ODOO Story ID.
- Push changes once tested and stable.
- Follow Java and organizational coding standards.
- Perform thorough unit testing before marking the task as complete.
Testing & Quality Assurance[edit | edit source]
- Verify the software functions as expected and meets requirements.
- Test both best-case and worst-case scenarios.
- Keep unit test cases updated and ensure they cover all core logic.
- Get your code peer-reviewed — it is the developer’s responsibility to initiate and complete this early, especially for large features.
- After review and testing, merge the feature branch into staging for final testing.
- Ensure minimum rework — this reflects strong initial analysis and testing quality.
Finalization & Release[edit | edit source]
- Fix identified bugs and get confirmation they don’t introduce regressions.
- Limit rework by validating changes during the SDLC, not post-QA.
- Once ready for release, merge changes into the develop branch in time for the next delivery cycle.
Communication & Team Collaboration[edit | edit source]
- Attend daily standups/scrum calls and clearly communicate:
- What you did
- What you're doing
- Any blockers
- Use Microsoft Teams and Outlook for team communication.
- Respond to messages at the earliest, especially when tagged or mentioned.
- Ask for help if stuck — don’t spend excessive time unproductively.
Leave & Emergency Protocol[edit | edit source]
- Inform the team in advance about planned leaves.
- In case of emergencies, notify peers as early as possible.
Responsibilities of Team Lead[edit | edit source]
- Plan sprints in advance and ensure:
- Task breakdown
- Developer clarity on requirements
- Balanced workload
- Help developers validate estimates and monitor timeline adherence.
- Step in to unblock stuck teammates and provide direction.
- Collect regular feedback and arrange whiteboard sessions to explain concepts, resolve blockers, and enhance peer learning.
Summary[edit | edit source]
This SDLC ensures disciplined software delivery with predictable outcomes. By enforcing early analysis, proactive communication, robust testing, and peer collaboration, Hein Fricke builds a high-quality codebase while maintaining audit-readiness. All team members are expected to adhere to these practices and continuously improve execution discipline.